General Category > LisaList2

Early Parallel Card question

<< < (2/2)

AlexTheCat123:
There also seems to be a slight difference in the solder mask on the gold fingers of the slot connector. The rounded tops of each finger aren't covered in solder mask on the "regular" version of the card, but they are on this earlier version. And the horizontal traces coming off pins 55 and 56 of the connector are briefly exposed in gold on the regular version, but are covered in solder mask here as well.

ried:
The logos of the PCB manufacturers (left side on the reverse) are different, too.

anotherLISAguy:
It is an interesting find and board members did a great job pointing out the differences between the two.  Having serviced a number of these machines back in the day, I can say the occasional inconsistency would pop up.  When I asked techs at the time about it, they brushed it off stating Apple used what they had in stock and all that mattered was that it worked for the task.  My guess is there will be other nuggets popping up that have been overlooked in the past.  Anyway, that's my 25 cents. 

ried:
Ralph, very nice to see you on here! Thank you for the anecdote, and the parallel card 8) I hope you'll continue sharing your insights about these special machines with the fine folks here.

Welcome!

compu_85:
I've got a super early, single port card... I think from a prototype system that didn't have the onboard parallel port. I've posted photos of it: https://lisalist2.com/index.php/topic,97.0.html

-J

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page