LISA File Transporter tool moves files from modern computers to the Workshop

[Eschaton]

Claude says:

Please don't do this. Anyone who wants to know what an LLM outputs for a prompt can use the LLM.

Are you not creating this tool yourself?

[sigma7]

Claude says:

Please don't do this. Anyone who wants to know what an LLM outputs for a prompt can use the LLM.

I have the impression that the cost of using Claude to do something non-trivial is rising rapidly, so I appreciate someone sharing their experiments. Maybe my opinion will change, and I'm thinking that AI generated stuff might be best annotated as such so that the context is clear (and any that don't want to look at it have that option).

Are you not creating this tool yourself?

It certainly looks like Claude is doing some portion of the work and I suspect the rapid progress on this tool is very much a result of that.

How long would it take before someone achieved the same without Claude?

We don't have many people interested in creating new Lisa software/hardware, so my personal opinion (for now, at least) is that we should encourage anyone that wants to, whether they choose to use AI or not.

[bmwcyclist]

I think I've noticed that parts of some recent postings have a distinctly non-human style and now wondering if we should have a formal requirement to style such content so it is easy to recognize the portion that is AI output... comments/suggestions?

I think it is important to know if you are interacting with an AI, BOT or human. Which is why I clearly put is "Claude says". I think a policy of that type would be good for LisaList2 IMHO.

[bmwcyclist]

Claude says:

Please don't do this. Anyone who wants to know what an LLM outputs for a prompt can use the LLM.

If you follow the threads, the output was from vibecoding so the logical answer is from the AI.

.

[bmwcyclist]

I have the impression that the cost of using Claude to do something non-trivial is rising rapidly, so I appreciate someone sharing their experiments. Maybe my opinion will change, and I'm thinking that AI generated stuff might be best annotated as such so that the context is clear (and any that don't want to look at it have that option).

I very much agree. I am about $300 into this so far and I doubt I am 1/2 done.

We don't have many people interested in creating new Lisa software/hardware, so my personal opinion (for now, at least) is that we should encourage anyone that wants to, whether they choose to use AI or not.

YES. Alex using Claude and providing examples for the Minesweeper app is what inspired my projects.

I personally think this could be a 'big break' for getting apps going for the LOS and a more active community. We will see.

I was worried about anti-AI when I made this post asking about posting vibecode here or on Github.

 https://lisalist2.com/index.php/topic,810.msg6045.html#msg6045

I DO think it is very important to be clear about what is AI and what is not.

I am not a developer, so I could not even begin any of the projects I am working on, and so far as I can tell, no one else was currently working on them.

All of it is built on the generous sharing of previous projects by others who are more knowledgeable and talented, as I always make clear.

I was given the advice (see thread link above) to use the tool to learn about the Lisa OS and development as I went, and that is exactly what I am doing.