Want an XLerator? Please participate in the market research thread: https://lisalist2.com/index.php/topic,594.msg4180.html
Quote from: ried on January 18, 2026, 01:39:46 PMYou could also download the .zip file in this Google Drive folder, unzip and copy its contents to the root of your SD card: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SnGo1Won63IntYfYbV4ddHpuPoutTXhc?usp=share_link
No need to rename any of the files. Let us know how it goes.
Quote from: AlexTheCat123 on January 18, 2026, 01:38:27 PMCould you try plugging your ESProFile into the built-in parallel port, the one that the Widget is currently connected to? That way, we can confirm whether it's a problem with ESProFile or something to do with the parallel card.
Quote from: stepleton on January 16, 2026, 04:28:54 AM(1) It would be nice if it didn't matter which USB port received the mouse and which received the keyboard.
Quote from: stepleton on January 16, 2026, 04:28:54 AM(2) The bottom edge of the board as depicted feels like the user-facing side of the machine, so it makes sense for that side to have the stuff the user is most often going to mess with. To me, this would argue for putting the floppy and hard drive SD slots on or near that edge if you can. If you need to free up room along the edge, maybe one of those double-stack USB sockets might help?
Quote from: sigma7 on January 16, 2026, 01:41:45 PMThen it occurred to me that the iterations of the layout for ports and ancillary hardware might be separated from the iterations of the core functionality, reducing the cost for incremental changes to one or the other.
ie. determine a suitable boundary (eg. low speed and fewest signals) for separating legacy ports from the FPGA and RAM, and implement a main board/daughterboard. The cost of an interconnect is substantial, but when the cost of new boards is so high.... depends on your confidence level as to how many iterations you expect and if early versions are complete write-offs or still useful. Lowering the cost of changing the legacy ports layout could make it more practical/economical to have different final configurations too.
Quote from: sigma7 on January 16, 2026, 01:41:45 PMFor the floppy, consider making the layout compatible with a 26 pin header that has two pins removed so a 20 pin plug will still fit.
QuoteWith the disclaimer that free suggestions are worth what you pay for them...Ditto
Quote(2) The bottom edge of the board as depicted feels like the user-facing side of the machine, so it makes sense for that side to have the stuff the user is most often going to mess with.This seems like great advice, and got me thinking, what would I move where... Lisa mouse port to back perhaps and....