gilles wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiosity, which images failed their checksums?
>>
>
> All disk that were modified with a PC failed, I suppose it's because
> disccopy cannot find checksum in the resource fork (images were transfered with
> a mac 1.44 floppy using HFVexplorer).
>
> The test on real hardware is a success, I now have a uniplus 1.4
> kernel on my Xprofile and it boots in single user, so there is still a bug in
> IDLE, maybe in the profile emulation.
>
That's a bit strange since Disk Copy doesn't store its checksums in a resource fork - as far as I know, only DART does that. The only thing that matters when copying Disk Copy 4.2 images back to a real Mac is changing the file/creator type.
It might be some issue with HFVexplorer, however. I don't know whether that program regenerates the checksums.
But that is good news - at least we know that the boot/root disks work and there's no further serialization issues.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LisaList" group. To post to this group, send email to lisalist_at_email.domain.hidden To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lisalist-unsubscribe_at_email.domain.hidden For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lisalist?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- Received on 2008-03-30 07:26:19
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : 2020-01-13 12:15:21 EST