Hi,
in the schematic http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/
schemview.php?id=1419 you can see CR11 (two diodes in one housing). I
think this one has ONE corrupted diode. It's very unlikely that all
two diodes have a shortcut. So you can measure them both and there
should not be a significant difference. As I'm not so familiar in
technical english I try do describe with my own words what you'll
have to do to get this fixed:
Keep the power-supply off for approx min. 10 minutes (better a few
hours) so that all electical components could discharge themselves.
First you do not need to unsolder sth. because the fault is very
uncritical, you will get two really different results in measurement,
when you connect one pin of CR1 on the soldering side with the
kathode (=housing of that dual-diode) with an ohm-meter. If you have
a "modern" multimeter, then use the "diode-test"-function and you
should get the result "infinity" (and after switching the red and
black measurement-cable, you'll get 0.5 up to 0.8 volts as result for
the diode) if the diode is still working. There are minor
variabilities, because the surrounded components may determine the
results, but not very much.
IF YOUR DIODE IS BAD, the you'll get either ZERO ohm (or ZERO volts
in diode-test-function). It doesn't matter wheter you connect the red
cable with the anode and black with kathode or reverse: you'll always
get nearly zero, because the diode is bad = shortcut
You'll then have to replace it with two single diodes with the
following data: 50 V and 25 A or more than that. Perhaps you'll still
get the original dual diode, or a similar one with the same
connections: two anodes = pins and kathode = metal-housing. And keep
an eye on cooling the diodes, if you'll not get the original one :-)
I hope my description was not to gramatically bad :-)
But I'll speak very much better german than english
greetings: TOM from Bavaria, the center of europe, the country with
the marvellous castles of Koenig Ludwig, the alps and the original
Octoberfest in munich
Am 21.03.2007 um 21:59 schrieb Patrick Garber:
> O my bad did you mean The huge mj8505 transistor? I was told that
> I could replace with MJ16018, It would be easier if you could tell
> me what to check based on the number from the schematic I have.
> from http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/schemview.php?id=1419
> Because I am so lost on this, I must be stupid today so sorry
> everyone.
>
> Patrick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LisaList" group. To post to this group, send email to lisalist_at_email.domain.hidden To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lisalist-unsubscribe_at_email.domain.hidden For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lisalist?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : 2020-01-13 12:15:13 EST