simon wrote:
>
> well, there is no need for a active moderator in a wiki, We all
> moderate info. the only task of the owner of the wiki is to make
> regular backups for if the server crashes. If a page is altered, the
> older version is allways available for restoration. The fun part is
> that colaborating on a topic can be done by more persons at the same
> time. for example, i can setup a doc on Xenix and soeone can acorrect
> me if i'm wrong. there is no need for a preset structure, as the wiki
> can be structured on the fly.
>
So what prevents the hoardes of spam and/or google link farmers from
flooding the wiki with junk then? Someone, whether the community at
large, or a few moderators are still required to undo damage.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LisaList" group. To post to this group, send email to lisalist_at_email.domain.hidden To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lisalist-unsubscribe_at_email.domain.hidden For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lisalist?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
. Received on 2015-07-15 16:37:25
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : 2020-01-13 12:15:15 EST